100% increase in MHS Special Events or use of our on-street parking 50 times a year.

From: charlessands@aol.com
Date: January 6, 2010 7:57:16 AM PST
To: hv residents
Subject: 100% increase in MHS Special Events or use of our on-street parking 50 times a year.

FYI. I've discovered another MHS deception. I intend to send the below message to the County, MHS and copy concerned Homestead Valley residents. Comments ??? or hit reply to unsubscribe>

Harold C. Brown Jr.
President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Dear Mr. Brown,

Marin Horizon School’s Use Permit proposed number of Special Events (36 day events and 14 evening events. 50 total) approved by Board of Supervisors’ Resolution 2005-105, was not provided to the County’s MHS’ environmental traffic consultant Dowling Associates Inc. for their information and use during their environmental impact evaluation of MHS’ proposed Special Events on our Homestead Valley community. Why?

Dowling Associates Inc. (DAI) was only provided with MHS’ 2005 Event Schedule May dated 5/20/2004 describing: Approx. Date; Event Name-Major Event Bold; Time of Day; Hours ; Who Is Involved; Attendee Estimate and Parking Plan.

The above MHS’ Special Events given to DAI as base information for their environmental impact evaluation use shows 12 evening events and 13 day events (25 total ) as being scheduled for 2005.

The number of MHS ‘Special Events (25) Dowling Associates Inc used to determine MHS’ Special Events impact our streets and on street parking is 100% smaller than the MHS’ Use Permit Special Events (50) approved by BOS Resolution 2005-105.

It seems that neither the County nor MHS provided the County’s environmental traffic consultant with the factual and complete numbers of MHS’ day, evening and total Special Events

The failure to provide the County’s traffic consultant with factual and complete data resulted in the traffic consultant not knowing, that if approved by the Board of Supervisors, that MHS intended to increase the number Special Events by 100%.

Garbage in garbage described above out resulted in the BOS’ approval of 2005-104 and 2005-105.

Instead of MHS usurping the surrounding community’s on street parking and increasing traffic on Montford, Melrose, Evergreen, Laverne and other surrounding street 25 times a year, MHS will now usurp the communities parking and increase traffic on their streets 50 times per year. A 100% increase.

Coupled with the already indentified County’s massive errors and omissions to require MHS to conform with Title 24 parking code requirements such additional errors in favor of MHS a s the above strongly suggest that some individual (s) at the County is/are either incompetent or unethical.

Who at the County will act to correct the wrongs imposed on the Homestead Valley community?

The only way MHS’ Middle School, Elementary School Kindergarten and Nursery could have been imposed on the substandard Homestead Valley elementary school site would be: To provide County environmental impact consultant’s with incomplete data and to commit massive errors and omissions in order to conceal MHS’ massive non-conformance to the County Wide Plan, Tamalpais Area Community Plan, and sections in Title 19, Title 22 and Title 24 in order to gain BOS approval of MHS’ proposed expansion plan

MHS’ E.I.S. bias is demonstrably replete with documented errors and omissions favoring only MHS and as such was not prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

MHS’ deceptive E.I.S. was used by County employees to misinform and mislead the BOS into approving MHS proposed expansion plan, Negative Declaration and Use Permit on August 30, 2005

If the Board of Supervisors have any concern for their collective and individual reputation and County’s officials’ and employee’s reputations for unbiased fairness, honesty and, objectivity then the BOS would convene an independent unbiased professional Special Investigation to determine the County individual (s) responsible for providing MHS’ incomplete and biased Environmental Initial Study that misinformed and mislead the 4 BOSs into approving Resolutions 2005 104 and 2005-105.

“It only takes one rotten apple to spoil a barrel”

Regards,

Charles