Mr McGlashan's reply re:...email "Marin Energy Authority..your electrical bill is about to sky rocket"

From: charlessands@aol.com
Date: January 14, 2010 9:39:32 PM PST
To: CMcGlashan@co.marin.ca.us
Cc: hbrown@co.marin.ca.us, cmurray@co.marin.ca.us, skinsey@co.marin.ca.us, sadams@co.marin.ca.us, madroneparkcircle@yahoogroups.com, more
Subject: Mr McGlashan's reply re: my email "Marin Energy Authority..your electrical bill is about to sky rocket"

What is "JUST WRONG" Mr, McGlashan in your email reply to my email is that you evaded telling everyone you emailed what right Marin Energy Authority (MEA) has to enroll any-one's name without their consent in MEA which a violation of their privacy.

And you did not explain in your reply to my email what happens after the first year? The first several years are Marin Energy Authority start-up years whn theeare no "green energy" power suppliers capable of supplying Marin County's electrical power demand that I'm aware of. When MEA begins to buy "green" energy the cost will be astronomical according to President Obama. I choose to believe my President.

And you evadd answering the following remaining my points in my email.

1. Marin Energy Authority plans to enroll me in Marin Energy Authority without my consent which invades my right to privacy.

2. Marin Energy Authority plans to buy power from "green" power producers (Wind and solar farms) which currently are not sufficiently developed to produce the quantity of power required by Marin County.

3. "Green" power production is not yet currently economically feasible, competitive nor in the far future.

4. Marin Energy Authority requires $1,600,000 as "start-up" costs.

5. Marin Energy Authority's plan to buy power from yet existent "green" energy producers appears to be a legislated ploy to create a demand for "green" energy so that "green" energy investors such as T.Boone Pickens, Al. Gore and who knows what other fat cat Sierra Club and progressive democrats can sell financial investment instruments to raise the finances necessary to build "start-up" "green" energy production facilities and the necessary Ca. and interstate electrical transmission lines connecting "green" energy suppliers to PG&E.

8. All these "green" energy producer start-up costs will end up gushing down to me as a consumer with out my consent. I'm retired living on Social Security and an IRA.

6. As a "middle man" the administrative costs of Marin Energy Authority are not able to be controlled by the Ca. Utility Commission but will be passed to me via a PG&E monthly bill.

7. Wind mills are ugly detractors of scenic beauty. Ted Kennedy fought installing them far at sea in front of his vacation home on Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts

8. Solar panels are notoriously cost in-effective and they are also ugly detractors of the visual environment

9. Nuclear Energy is renewable, reliable, safe an d one plant is capable of supplying all of Northern California with cheaper electricity than fossil fuel power plants and "green" power farms. Disposable is feasible at Yucca Mountain, Nevada and with imagination spent fuel rods could be collected nation wide and stored on an Asteroid or other totally inhabitable planet.

10 France has had Nuclear Power plants for more than forty (40) years. No accidents for more than 40 years. And its so cheap my French relatives and everyone I know in France heats with electricity.