My response to the below email.
No one who knows me refers to me as "Chuck" :)
Marin Halliburton School' Environmental Study prepared by its Marin County friends in high places did not include a MHS/local traffic volume study on any local street.
If it had MHS would have been required to: Mitigate its traffic's significant negative impact on our streets by vanning or busing all of its out-of valley students a we petitioned Kinsey in 2003; Park all of its 136 vehicles on-site and: locate its Melrose Ave loading zone on-site as required by ordinance 24.04.340 (p).
We have repeatedly requested Supervisor Kinsey, DPW and Marin Halliburton School to have a MHS/local traffic volume study of pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles made since 2010 but they have ignored the request.
For good reason. MHS has no existent traffic study of walkers, bicycles and vehicles to support MHS' desire to impose a sidewalk on its Evergreen Ave. neighbors.
Why don't you ask MHS to provide an independent MHS/local traffic volume study of pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles to support its sidewalk proposal ?
Hiding behind a fictitious name and denigrating and demeaning others is typical of cowards with nothing of meaning or value that supports their position.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anonymous <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
To: charlessands <charlessands@aol.com>
Sent: Sat, Nov 26, 2011 5:39 am
Subject: [SANDS Box] New comment on Fwd: [SANDS Box] New comment on Rumblings from Eve....
From: Anonymous <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
To: charlessands <charlessands@aol.com>
Sent: Sat, Nov 26, 2011 5:39 am
Subject: [SANDS Box] New comment on Fwd: [SANDS Box] New comment on Rumblings from Eve....
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Fwd: [SANDS Box] New comment on Rumblings from Eve...":
Chuck, no one challenged it because no one takes you seriously. Your demeanor guarantees that.
And despite yet another one of your long-winded, rambling posts filled with nothing more than unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, you added nothing to support the study's validity.
Posted by Anonymous to SANDS Box at November 26, 2011 10:39 AM
Chuck, no one challenged it because no one takes you seriously. Your demeanor guarantees that.
And despite yet another one of your long-winded, rambling posts filled with nothing more than unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, you added nothing to support the study's validity.
Posted by Anonymous to SANDS Box at November 26, 2011 10:39 AM
1 comment:
Who cares, Chuck?
The debate is about your claim of an 'independent study' that supports your position. Substantiation provided by a "study" conducted by an "anonymous firm" is not substantiation. It's highly suspect and I'm willing to bet it was not conducted by an impartial, professional firm but rather a cranky old neighbor or two with a dog in the fight meaning it's totally biased and completely unreliable.
You continue to try and distract from this key point. But it's not working. Your entire argument is rendered worthless by the fact that you have based parts of it on highly suspect "facts."
Keep trying.
p.s. my identity is irrelevant given my facts are laid bare here. But if you're that curious...I'm not Mari.
Post a Comment